CST 300 Week 4
Part 1
My educational goal: To complete the program with a 4.0 GPA in the program by Summer of 2018 and retain enough knowledge to score in the 85th percentile or higher on the ETS Computer Science test.
Part 2
My career goal: To gain a position as a software developer no less than 3 months after graduation within the video game or financial industry with a starting salary of at least $60K annually.Part 3
In review of the ETS® Major Field Test for Computer Science, I feel confident in taking the test in 18 months. I browsed over the sample test and was able to get 8 out of 16 right. Considering I have 18 months of pure immersion in Computer Science I feel confident I can increase this to a 90 percentile or higher.
Part 4
In reading the article The 7 Career Goals You Need to Succeed, it is clearly important to write down your specific goals if you wish to succeed in your career. A key first step is self assessment. You need to look at where you are now and where you want to go. Another important step is to track your accomplishment so you can re-evaluate how you are doing at working towards your goal and tweak what needs tweaking. It is also important to set personal goals as well so you don't get overworked by focusing just on your career.
This week I learned about the 5 types of claims. These are claims of fact, definition, cause, value, and policy. I also was reminded of the importance of equally representing logos, ethos, and pathos within a argumentative paper.
The article on bias argumentation was informative. It provided the three most common fallacies in presenting arguments and why they are common. It also set as a reminder that the mere knowledge of these fallacies when presenting an argument can lead a presenter to provide arguments without these fallacies as they are more prone to think with an open mind.
The article on soundness vs validity gives a solid background in examining my sources for my ethics paper. It allows me to examine an argument to make sure it is a valid and sound argument that may be used in my paper.
My ethics paper has to do with the effects of moral choices in video games. During my research, I learned the exact opposite of what I assumed. It had been a while since I had looked at this topic in depth and found it was easier to find articles regarding the positive effects, or lack of negative effects regarding immoral acts and violence in video games than finding articles showing negative effects with regards to this. It seems that recent studies have shifted the mindset from how I remember this conversation 10 years ago; however, there is still a thriving debate for both sides.